Response to "Why Men Fail"

David Brooks presented a valid opinion in the argument of “Why Men Fail.”  Due to basic trends and statistics, men remain stagnate or fall short in their careers while women are rapidly overtaking most of the occupations.  Brooks gave several logos examples and evidence of his statements.  The origin of the problem for men begins with elementary and high school education; boys earn three- quarters of D’s and F’s.  In college, only 40 percent of men receive their Bachelor’s degree.  This affected the work force: women dominate 12 out of 15 occupations.  Women have more skills and men fall short of the skills needed for the job.  This topic represents pathos because it has a significant emotional impact on men because of the social hierarchy in the past generations.  Women no longer fit in the stereotype of a “stay at home” mother.  In current standings, they are classified as working mothers.  The article discusses the success of women: adaptability.  Men are still holding on to the old, traditional ways of society.  They linger for a job to appear while women take the initiative to become educated.  More education provides the acquired skills for a high- paying occupation.  Hanna Rosin, author of “End of Men,” states, “Women see a new social context, and they flexibly adapt to new circumstances.”  Women do not have the enormous pride men possess, which makes it easier for women to change.   This article contained various amounts of sources and statistics, which allowed the reader to believe his statements as valid.  The creditability of the writer was also strong because the article was from the New York Times, which was a solid representation of ethos.   This article was well organized and provided all the elements in order to capture and gain the respect of the reader.